Vice President Kamala Harris refuses to disclose her vote on California’s Proposition 36, a controversial crime ballot measure aimed at increasing penalties for retail and drug crimes.
At a Glance
- Proposition 36 aims to increase penalties for retail and drug crimes in California
- VP Kamala Harris declined to reveal her vote on the measure
- Governor Gavin Newsom opposes the proposition, citing resource misallocation
- A recent poll shows 73% of respondents plan to vote “yes” on Proposition 36
- The measure is supported by law enforcement associations and opposed by some progressive groups
Harris Stays Silent on Controversial Measure
As California gears up for a crucial vote on Proposition 36, Vice President Kamala Harris has chosen to remain tight-lipped about her stance on the measure.
Because that’s what we need from somebody vying to be the next president of the United States…silence!
When pressed by reporters, Harris declined to disclose her vote, stating, “So my ballot is on its way to California and I’m going to trust the system that it will arrive there. I’m not going to talk about the vote on that because, honestly, it’s the Sunday before the election. I don’t intend to create an endorsement one way or another around it, but I did vote.”
How did you vote, Kamala? Why won’t you tell us?
Harris’s refusal to take a clear stance on Proposition 36 reflects her cautious approach to divisive issues, potentially drawing criticism from both Republicans and left-leaning voters. This move is reminiscent of her past reluctance to take a position on Proposition 47, which aimed to reduce prison overcrowding by downgrading some felonies to misdemeanors.
Proposition 36: A Tough-on-Crime Approach
Proposition 36 is positioned as a response to rising crime rates in California, particularly targeting retail theft and drug-related offenses. The measure would make shoplifting a felony for repeat offenders and increase penalties for certain drug charges, including those involving fentanyl. Supporters argue that these changes are necessary to close legal loopholes that have hampered law enforcement efforts.
The California District Attorneys Association, California State Sheriffs’ Association, and the Republican Party of California have thrown their support behind the proposition. Notably, Democratic San Francisco Mayor London Breed has also endorsed the measure, highlighting the complex political landscape surrounding crime and public safety in the state.
But despite the backing from law enforcement groups, Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom has come out against Proposition 36. Newsom argues that the measure would divert resources from effective safety measures, stating it would take “millions from what’s proven to actually keep us safe.” The governor further emphasized that he “hope[s] people take the time to understand what they’re supporting.”
Harris avoids weighing in on California’s tough-on-crime measure Prop 36 https://t.co/9AI7FkuFR4
— Guardian US (@GuardianUS) November 3, 2024
However, Newsom’s opposition appears to be at odds with public sentiment. A recent Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) poll revealed that 73% of respondents plan to vote “yes” on Proposition 36, indicating strong support among Californians concerned about rising crime rates.
Newsom is weak on crime. We all knew this anyway.
The debate over Proposition 36 comes at a time when crime and criminal justice reform are at the forefront of California’s political discourse. San Francisco Mayor London Breed faces a tough reelection campaign amid criticisms of her handling of crime and homelessness. Meanwhile, Alameda County District Attorney Pamela Price faces a recall, and Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascón is challenged for his progressive crime policies.
Crime data indicates an increase in shoplifting in the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles from 2021 to 2022, fueling concerns about public safety. Proposition 36 would not only increase punishments for some crimes but also warn drug sellers they could face murder charges if their actions lead to a death.
As Californians prepare to cast their votes, the stark divide between political leadership and public opinion on crime and punishment remains evident. The outcome of Proposition 36 will likely have far-reaching implications for the state’s approach to criminal justice and public safety in the years to come.
If Kamala wants to win, she should treat voters with at least some respect.
