Tariffs are weighing heavily on major U.S. companies, with farm equipment giant John Deere reporting steep profit declines and fashion retailer Tapestry posting significant losses tied to trade-related pressures.
At a Glance
- John Deere reported a 9% revenue drop and 26% fall in net income
- Tapestry posted an $855 million impairment charge, leading to a $517 million loss
- Deere’s stock slid nearly 7% after earnings were released
- Analysts cite tariffs as a central factor raising costs and reducing demand
Deere’s Harvest Shrinks
John Deere, the nation’s leading agricultural equipment manufacturer, reported a 9% decline in revenue and a 26% drop in net income for the most recent quarter. Executives attributed the losses to weakened farm spending, which they said was linked to ongoing trade tensions and uncertainty. Farmers facing higher input costs due to tariffs have delayed or canceled purchases of new machinery, eroding Deere’s sales pipeline.
Watch now: John Deere’s Crisis: 1,800+ Jobs Cut Since 2024 & Trump’s Tariff Threat · YouTube
The financial results triggered a nearly 7% decline in Deere’s stock, reflecting investor concerns that prolonged tariff disputes could dampen agricultural spending well into next year. Analysts warn that a sustained downturn in farm equipment orders may spill into related industries, from steel suppliers to local dealerships.
Fashion Retail Faces Headwinds
The impact of tariffs is not limited to heavy industry. Tapestry, parent company of brands including Coach and Kate Spade, announced an $855 million impairment tied primarily to its Kate Spade label. The write-down contributed to a $517 million quarterly loss. Executives linked the financial hit to higher costs across supply chains and weaker consumer demand amid rising prices.
The company’s struggles highlight the broader retail sector’s exposure to tariffs. Apparel firms, which rely heavily on imported goods and materials, face mounting expenses that are often passed on to consumers. This dynamic has weighed on sales and margins, underscoring how trade policies ripple through industries far removed from their intended targets.
Communities in the Crosshairs
The effects of corporate slowdowns reach beyond earnings reports. Communities dependent on Deere manufacturing plants face potential knock-on impacts, including reduced hours and employment uncertainty. Similarly, retailers tied to Tapestry brands could experience weaker sales, affecting both urban and suburban shopping districts.
Economists caution that these corporate struggles point to a broader trend: tariffs act as an indirect tax on businesses and consumers alike. With input costs rising, firms are forced to make difficult choices between absorbing losses, cutting jobs, or passing costs to households already strained by inflation.
Long-Term Outlook
While policymakers continue to argue over the merits of tariffs, analysts stress that major companies are already adjusting to a more volatile trade environment. Deere’s results suggest that industries deeply linked to global supply chains remain vulnerable, while Tapestry’s losses illustrate the challenges for consumer-facing sectors.
The persistence of these trends raises questions about how long firms and communities can weather the pressure. Unless trade tensions ease or domestic demand strengthens significantly, the balance between protecting domestic industries and preserving corporate health will remain precarious.
